Argento and Positive Queer Representation

Four Flies on Grey Velvet (Dario Argento/1974)

Horror films have a long history with queer themes, fandom, and study. For decades now there have been hundreds of queer horror screenings, convention panels, academic studies, and articles like this fueled by a variety of things ranging from gay themes and creators to a love of camp. Despite this sizable fanbase from the community, horror films for a long time however were not positive to the queer community.

From 1930ish to around even the early 2010s, a lot of the presentation of queer characters is either coded, villains, or a punchline. Even in films celebrated and typically seen as generally positive by queer audiences and academics like Fright Night (Tom Holland/1985), our entry into queerdom within the film are characters who are meant to be perceived by the audience as villains.

Within the mainstream horror of the 1970s and 1980s, there was one popular figure somewhat regularly writing openly queer character in a non-negative light: Dario Argento.

Argento, while problematic at times, wrote several gay or lesbian characters during his golden age. These characters were not coded, villains, or punchlines. There were genuine attempts by Argento to just write those around him into his films. On the use of a lesbian character in 1982’s Tenebrae, Argento stated his goal was to “…recount this subject freely and in an open manner, without interference or being ashamed.” This recounting in Argento’s opinion resulted in the film receiving a harsh adult-only rating in his native Italy, which was highly conservative towards homosexuality.

Tenebrae’s portrayal of lesbianism has been criticized. The Brag’s Michael Louis Kennedy stated “if your entire knowledge of lesbians comes from films like Argento’s Tenebrae, you could be forgiven for thinking that all they do is have showers and get murdered.” But this sort of criticism ignores that the lesbians on display in the film are not like any other lesbians in mainstream horror of that era. They are not titillating like the ones in the Hammer films, they are bitter lovers and Mirella D’Angelo’s Tilde is more developed than most male horror characters at the time.

A little over a decade prior, Argento made 1971’s Four Flies on Grey Velvet which features another prominent gay character in Gianni Arrosio, portrayed by revered French actor Jean-Pierre Marielle. Arrosio is a flamboyantly gay detective who is employed by our hero, Roberto, to help uncover his tormentor after Arrosio convinces Roberto to cast his homophobic concerns aside. Like with Tilde, Arrosio is not a predator or villain, is not used exclusively for humour (he is a funny character), and is given a fleshed-out character, admittedly somewhat stereotypically.

It is worth noting, both characters mentioned above are killed: Tilde and her lover are brutally slaughtered while Arrosio is somewhat humiliatingly poisoned (he is given a moment of dignity in knowing he’s solved the case, something he hadn’t done in 3 years). With these deaths and how they go down, it would be very easy to dismiss them as token cannon fodder being used in a similar fashion many characters of colour in horror (eg. The Black Dude Dies First trope) but they really can’t be because of how rare they are.

While not perfect, Four Flies on Grey Velvet’s and Tenebrae’s queer characters are again written as openly gay, both are fully fleshed out, and neither’s sexuality is fetishized or presented as a joke or danger. These are positive portrayals of openly queer characters that arguably not be equaled in horror mainstream cinema until Paranorman (Sam Fell and Chris Butler/2012). Even in Argento’s own filmography, which includes a good number of queer characters outside of these ones, these characters stand apart in terms of their presentation.

And yet, despite how these characters are presented and Argento’s incredibly high reputation among mainstream and art-house horror fans, Argento’s queer presentation is often overlooked when discussing queer horror. General interest publications, Queer outlets, and even horror and genre publications will overlook Argento’s works to favour far more problematic films like May (Lucky McGee/2003), which includes lesbianism through a male gaze and predatory lesbianism, or the incredibly negative A Nightmare on Elm Street 2: Freddy’s Revenge (Jack Shoulder/1985), which frames queerness itself as a horror when viewed through a queer lens. Only recently did Bloody Disgusting’s Horror Queers podcast see its Joe Lipsett and Trace Thurman discuss how positive and important these portrayals are on their episode on Tenebrae. It’s hard to pinpoint why these works go largely ignored but if one had to guess it might be how blended these characters are into the works.

While noticeable, neither is the lead, the foe, or even a sidekick. These are just people in their films and audiences usually don’t gravitate towards these sorts of side characters. And to be honest that’s a shame because Argento’s celebrity and portrayal of queer characters could be used normalize a marginalized group within mainstream horror. As film analyst Leon Thomas put it in his 2018 video essay The Gay Nightmare: “we shouldn’t have to sieved through subtext to find our gay icons”.

From 1930ish to around even the early 2010s, a lot of the presentation of queer characters is either coded, villains, or a punchline. Even in films celebrated and typically seen as generally positive by queer audiences and academics like Fright Night (Tom Holland/1985), our entry into queerdom within the film are characters who are meant to be perceived by the audience as villains.

Within the mainstream horror of the 1970s and 1980s, there was one popular figure somewhat regularly writing openly queer character in a non-negative light: Dario Argento.

Argento, while problematic at times, wrote several gay or lesbian characters during his golden age. These characters were not coded, villains, or punchlines. There were genuine attempts by Argento to just write those around him into his films. On the use of a lesbian character in 1982’s Tenebrae, Argento stated his goal was to “…recount this subject freely and in an open manner, without interference or being ashamed.” This recounting in Argento’s opinion resulted in the film receiving a harsh adult-only rating in his native Italy, which was highly conservative towards homosexuality.

Tenebrae’s portrayal of lesbianism has been criticized. The Brag’s Michael Louis Kennedy stated “if your entire knowledge of lesbians comes from films like Argento’s Tenebrae, you could be forgiven for thinking that all they do is have showers and get murdered.” But this sort of criticism ignores that the lesbians on display in the film are not like any other lesbians in mainstream horror of that era. They are not titillating like the ones in the Hammer films, they are bitter lovers and Mirella D’Angelo’s Tilde is more developed than most male horror characters at the time.

A little over a decade prior, Argento made 1971’s Four Flies on Grey Velvet which features another prominent gay character in Gianni Arrosio, portrayed by revered French actor Jean-Pierre Marielle. Arrosio is a flamboyantly gay detective who is employed by our hero, Roberto, to help uncover his tormentor after Arrosio convinces Roberto to cast his homophobic concerns aside. Like with Tilde, Arrosio is not a predator or villain, is not used exclusively for humour (he is a funny character), and is given a fleshed-out character, admittedly somewhat stereotypically.

It is worth noting, both characters mentioned above are killed: Tilde and her lover are brutally slaughtered while Arrosio is somewhat humiliatingly poisoned. With these deaths and how they go down, it would be very easy to dismiss them as token cannon fodder being used in a similar fashion many characters of colour in horror (eg. The Black Dude Dies First trope) but they really can’t be because of how rare they are.

While not perfect, Four Flies on Grey Velvet’s and Tenebrae’s queer characters are again written as openly gay, both are fully fleshed out, and neither’s sexuality is fetishized or presented as a joke or danger. These are positive portrayals of openly queer characters that arguably not be equaled in horror mainstream cinema until Paranorman (Sam Fell and Chris Butler/2012). Even in Argento’s own filmography, which includes a good number of queer characters outside of these ones, these characters stand apart in terms of their presentation.

And yet, despite how these characters are presented and Argento’s incredibly high reputation among mainstream and art-house horror fans, Argento’s queer presentation is often overlooked when discussing queer horror. General interest publications, Queer outlets, and even horror and genre publications will overlook Argento’s works to favour far more problematic films like May (Lucky McGee/2003), which includes lesbianism through a male gaze and predatory lesbianism, or the incredibly negative A Nightmare on Elm Street 2: Freddy’s Revenge (Jack Shoulder/1985), which frames queerness itself as a horror when viewed through a queer lens. Only recently did Bloody Disgusting’s Horror Queers podcast see its Joe Lipsett and Trace Thurman discuss how positive and important these portrayals are on their episode on Tenebrae. It’s hard to pinpoint why these works go largely ignored but if one had to guess it might be how blended these characters are into the works.

While noticeable, neither is the lead, the foe, or even a sidekick. These are just people in their films and audiences usually don’t gravitate towards these sorts of side characters. And to be honest that’s a shame because Argento’s celebrity and portrayal of queer characters could be used normalize a marginalized group within mainstream horror. As film analyst Leon Thomas put it in his 2018 video essay The Gay Nightmare: “we shouldn’t have to sieved through subtext to find our gay icons”.

M Rooney is a filmmaker and programmer from Toronto, Canada. He studied fine art at Thompson Rivers University.

Breaking the Sports Film

United Passions (2014)

In a year rocked by a virus, we finally will see a champion crowned in one of North America’s “Big Four” as the NHL’s Stanley Cup finals, featuring the Dallas Stars and Tampa Bay Lightning, has begun. It’s a return to a degree normalcy in many for Canada and the United States. It would probably make a good sports film, a genre so formulaic it is hard to break away from.

In simple terms the formula of the sports film is as follows: team or player is underperforming, team or player faces real adversity, team or player finds a way to push past adversity, grand finale with a glorious moment of sorts. This formula can be found it almost every single modern sports film whether it has an animal as the lead (MVP: Most Valuable Primate/Robert Vince – 2000) or is incredibly bleak (The Wrestler/Darren Aronofsky – 2008) or is Sci-Fi schlock (RollerBall/Norman Jewison – 1975). The formula is in the blood of a sport film. But why?

The answer is super duper simple. If one looks to real-world sports, one will easily notice the tendency of general fans to hate “the elite.” Teams like the Real Madrid or New England Patriots are met which such a universal groan that an outsider can’t help but want to cheer for an underdog like the Celta de Vigo or the Jacksonville Jaguars when they meet these alphas. This anti-establishment-like attitude has seemingly flowed into related cinema.

With this, the question of what successful strays to the formula are there arises.

Certainly, there are a number of great documentaries about sports and sports figures that give the formula little care but they often are not considered sports films, but rather regarded as more of a cultural study that just happens to be about sport, and dramatic films like Raging Bull (Martin Scorsese – 1980) or The Pride of the Yankees (Sam Wood – 1942) seem almost 50/50 on whether they are counted as a sports film or as something else because their focus isn’t the sport as much as the story outside of the sport, despite hitting the right plot points.

There is one very clear exception to the typical sport film rules that still clearly falls into the sports film category as it is a complete celebration of sport: the critically panned and FIFA-produced propaganda film United Passions (Frédéric Auburtin – 2014) which pushes athletics and coaching aside in favour of the promotion executives and movers and shakers. While the film failed to catch fire, HBO’s Dwayne Johnson-lead Ballers (Stephen Levinson – 2015-19) proved that a behind the scenes sports story mostly devoid of the underdog element can be a commercial success, at least on television where subversions of the typical sports story have been popular for years.

While cinema has an idea of how to change the sports film formula, it seems uncertain that a film focused on a superstar athlete or alpha team can be a success with a general audience. While Todd Phillips’ upcoming Hulk Hogan-biopic might change things, we’re likely to see a number of films like The Way Back (Gavin O’Connor – 2020) for years to come.

M Rooney is a filmmaker and programmer from Toronto, Canada. He studied fine art at Thompson Rivers University.

The Lost History of Found Footage

Host (Rob Savage/2020)

When it comes to finding a genre which is easily accessible to the general public in terms of being easy to make and enjoyable to watch, found-footage is seemingly the overall de facto king. The genre is typically low-cost and easy to produce and a proven draw. It is also one of the few populist examples of conceptual art as the films are presented as the audience is directly viewing the so-called found footage, which is often presented as shot by an amateur, rather than a completed project, this factor separates it from mockumentary.

Yet despite the genre’s popularity and artistic merits, scholarly study of the genre is mostly lacking as evident by the deep misunderstanding of the genre’s history. As two recent productions, Shudder’s short feature Host (Rob Savage/2020) and the podcast Astonishing Legends’ (Scott Philbrook and Forrest Burgess/2014-) exploration of the hoax film Alien Autopsy (unknown/1995), have sparked public interest in the genre once again it seems like a good time to explore this misunderstood history.

To begin with, the popularization of found footage is very clear. At the 1992 Cannes Film Festival Man Bites Dogs (Rémy Belvaux, André Bonzel, and Benoît Poelvoorde/1992) garnered critical acclaim and a cult fanbase, that same year Ghostwatch (Lesley Manning/1992) presented many of the genre’s core elements to the British public with its haunted broadcast approach on BBC, The Blair Witch Project (Daniel Myrick and Eduardo Sánchez/1999) introduced the genre to the American general public on a large scale (note: despite coming earlier and having a mainstream release Alien Autopsy was a full-fledged hoax rather than a conventional film like The Blair Witch Project) and Paranormal Actively (Oren Peli/2007) caused found footage to flood the market. This history is mostly settled and will not be discussed further. What will be discussed is where the genre starts.

A quick Google search of the phrase “first found footage film” will produce the following answer: Cannibal Holocaust (Ruggero Deodato/1979). This claim is backed up by publications and organizations like IndieWire, Syfy, and Cult MLT. On the surface, a film showing the footage of a lost film crew that came out years before most other early found footage films seems like a no brainer but ultimately the claims Cannibal Holocaust even belongs in the genre is fairly bogus. Found footage as mentioned is conceptual filmmaking and due to its framing device, a professor viewing the footage after retrieving it from the Amazon, eliminates any claim that Cannibal Holocaust is part of the genre.

Cannibal Holocaust’s status seems more rooted in the film’s marketing, which infamously claimed what was shown on screen was real, than the content of the film itself which raises the question: If Cannibal Holocaust is to be granted the status of first found footage film because of this marketing tactic than what about Snuff (Michael Findlay and Horacio Fredriksson/1976) a film that claimed to present a real murder on camera? Snuff’s footage is far more clearly staged than Cannibal Holocaust but it none the less made the exact same claim in its marketing. For this reason, it is best to simply reject these sorts of films, along with Guinea Pig 2: Flower of Flesh and Blood (Hideshi Hino/1985), a film western audiences believed was a snuff film, and Faces of Death (John Alan Schwartz/1978) from the conversation.

If Cannibal Holocaust is out, what takes its spot? If one were to ask Brad Miska, co-founder of Bloody Disgusting, the answer is UFO Abduction (Dean Alioto/1989). Unlike Cannibal HolocaustUFO Abduction uses the found footage formula perfectly. It was so well done that when the film was rebranded as The McPherson Tape by bootleggers it became incredibly popular with UFOlogists and underground film collectors who believed it to be the real deal. Its popularity in the underground eventually led Alioto to remake the film for UPN as Alien Abduction: Incident in Lake County (Dean Alioto/1998).

Miska’s claims on paper are hard to dispute due to how perfectly done UFO Abduction is but the claim ignores some high profile works that came prior.

The most noted example is experimental film icon Shirley Clarke’s jazz drama The Connection (Shirley Clarke/1961) which attempted to avoid censorship by framing itself as a lost documentary film. While the film does uses some found footage concepts, it stays very close conventional filmmaking, in many ways closer to a mockumentary than found footage, and due to it was born out of a well-known stage play and this fact was largely known to the public the illusion was largely never present. Despite these factors, outlets such as The New Yorker have deemed it a “primordial found footage film.”

The Connection is the first film listed on Wikipedia’s list of found footage films, followed by Cannibal Holocaust, Guinea Pig 2: Flower of Flesh and Blood, and UFO Abduction, if the first films listed can be eliminated does anything predate UFO Abduction? Yes, a year prior underground gay porn icon Bruce LaBruce and friend Candy Parker made the short Bruce and Pepper Wayne Gacy’s Home Movies (Bruce LaBruce and Candy Parker/1988) starring LaBruce and cult punk figures G. B. Jones and Dave Dictor. The film follows the same approach as UFO Abduction in most ways expect its release, while UFO Abduction took to the home video market and played off of “is it real?” hype Bruce and Pepper Wayne Gacy’s Home Movies took to art galleries and festivals and never was presented as truly authentic.

Even with Bruce and Pepper Wayne Gacy’s Home Movies the question of the first found footage film remains unknown and disputed as there are other noteworthy examples, such as ITV’s conspiracy spawning sci-fi TV film Alternative 3 (Christopher Miles/1977), and as serious academic research into this history is lacking the true launching pad may always remain a mystery. 

For a genre so popular, artistically interesting, and seemingly as young as found footage to have such a hazy history is very strange and something that in 2020 should be made clear. Perhaps it’s time for a serious film scholar to dive in.

M Rooney is a filmmaker and programmer from Toronto, Canada. He studied fine art at Thompson Rivers University.